{"entries":[{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":0.0,"col":"E_BANK","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0,"prior":886.87,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"estimated","v":886.87,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":0.0,"col":"E_BANK","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0,"prior":12144.43,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"estimated","v":12144.43,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":0.0,"col":"E_BANK","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0,"prior":27.9,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"estimated","v":27.9,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-38.95,"col":"E_INSP","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.137291,"prior":283.72,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":244.77,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-0.26,"col":"E_INSP","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.137291,"prior":1.87,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"estimated","v":1.62,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":18358.19,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"loans","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.098065,"prior":187204.9,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":205563.09,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- E_NBFC R4 loans, 1,87,205 -> 2,05,567 (18,362, +9.8%; z 1.098; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,25,641."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":57.8,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.453824,"prior":127.35,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":185.15,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- E_NBFC: 2,07,579 -> 2,28,374 (20,795, +10.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 loans 18,362 (+9.8%); fincorp R4 nongov_bonds 1,879 (+9.8%); fincorp R8 dividends 494 (+45.4%); fincorp R4 mf_lookthrough 58 (+45.4%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 3 (+45.4%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1878.31,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.098065,"prior":19153.74,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":21032.04,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- E_NBFC: 2,07,579 -> 2,28,374 (20,795, +10.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 loans 18,362 (+9.8%); fincorp R4 nongov_bonds 1,879 (+9.8%); fincorp R8 dividends 494 (+45.4%); fincorp R4 mf_lookthrough 58 (+45.4%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 3 (+45.4%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":493.73,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.453824,"prior":1087.93,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":1581.65,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- E_NBFC: 2,07,579 -> 2,28,374 (20,795, +10.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 loans 18,362 (+9.8%); fincorp R4 nongov_bonds 1,879 (+9.8%); fincorp R8 dividends 494 (+45.4%); fincorp R4 mf_lookthrough 58 (+45.4%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 3 (+45.4%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":2.52,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.453824,"prior":5.55,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":8.07,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- E_NBFC: 2,07,579 -> 2,28,374 (20,795, +10.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 loans 18,362 (+9.8%); fincorp R4 nongov_bonds 1,879 (+9.8%); fincorp R8 dividends 494 (+45.4%); fincorp R4 mf_lookthrough 58 (+45.4%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 3 (+45.4%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":594.81,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"loans","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.002342,"prior":253998.15,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":254592.96,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1.94,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0094,"prior":206.12,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":208.06,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":91.85,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.002342,"prior":39220.64,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":39312.48,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":366.26,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"distributed_income","confidence":"low","flags":["old_base_structure","depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0094,"prior":38963.45,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:c1a4fab1d145","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":39329.71,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":20.17,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"distributed_income_mf","confidence":"low","flags":["old_base_structure","depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0094,"prior":2145.66,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:c1a4fab1d145","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":2165.83,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":85.53,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0094,"prior":9099.01,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":9184.54,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":4.71,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0094,"prior":501.07,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":505.78,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":68787.89,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"loans","confidence":"medium","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.594481,"prior":115710.84,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":184498.73,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). E_BANK <- E_NFPU R5 loans, 1,15,711 -> 1,84,502 (68,791, +59.5%; z 1.595; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37). GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,56,521. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":490.89,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":5.463644,"prior":89.85,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":580.73,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). Cell E_BANK <- E_NFPU: 1,27,223 -> 2,02,372 (75,149, +59.1%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 loans 68,791 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 5,431 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 mf_lookthrough 491 (+546.4%); fincorp R8 dividends 409 (+19.1%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 27 (+19.1%). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37)."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":5430.74,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.594481,"prior":9135.26,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":14566.0,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). E_BANK <- E_NFPU R5 nongov_bonds, 9,135 -> 14,566 (5,431, +59.5%; z 1.595; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37). GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 12,357. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["fincorp:r8.nfpu_nongov_holders"],"bop_function":null,"change":408.31,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.190415,"prior":2144.31,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":2552.62,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). Cell E_BANK <- E_NFPU: 1,27,223 -> 2,02,372 (75,149, +59.1%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 loans 68,791 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 5,431 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 mf_lookthrough 491 (+546.4%); fincorp R8 dividends 409 (+19.1%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 27 (+19.1%). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37)."},{"binding":["fincorp:r8.nfpu_nongov_holders"],"bop_function":null,"change":27.22,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.190415,"prior":142.95,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":170.17,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). Cell E_BANK <- E_NFPU: 1,27,223 -> 2,02,372 (75,149, +59.1%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 loans 68,791 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 5,431 (+59.5%); fincorp R5 mf_lookthrough 491 (+546.4%); fincorp R8 dividends 409 (+19.1%); fincorp R8 mf_lookthrough 27 (+19.1%). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37)."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":269.4,"col":"E_RBI","component":"laf_sdf","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":0.021265,"prior":12668.88,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:eb0cad7d503e","ref":"R4","role":"anchored","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":12938.28,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.fins_gos"],"bop_function":null,"change":13490.81,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"private","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.040843,"prior":330310.12,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":343800.94,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- F_GOSC F4a private, 3,30,310 -> 3,43,804 (13,494, +4.1%; z 1.041; free medium; binding: f4a.fins_gos (target 9,68,693, balanced 9,68,692, at its lower edge)). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. f4a.fins_gos holds banks + NBFCs + RBI GOS at SUT industry 55; balancing moved GOS from NBFCs to banks, toward the RTP P&L evidence (banks' operating profit), which fincorp-2 shows the NAS 8.12 split understates for banks. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 3,39,506."},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.fins_gos","fincorp:f4a.public"],"bop_function":null,"change":8489.3,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"public","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.03785,"prior":224285.45,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":232774.75,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- F_GOSC F4a public, 2,24,285 -> 2,32,776 (8,491, +3.8%; z 1.038; free medium; binding: f4a.fins_gos (target 9,68,693, balanced 9,68,692, at its lower edge); f4a.public (target 4,34,233, balanced 4,34,234, at its upper edge)). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. f4a.fins_gos holds banks + NBFCs + RBI GOS at SUT industry 55; balancing moved GOS from NBFCs to banks, toward the RTP P&L evidence (banks' operating profit), which fincorp-2 shows the NAS 8.12 split understates for banks. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,30,530."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":6709.99,"col":"G_CEN","component":"dated_securities","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.025068,"prior":267666.98,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":274376.97,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- G_CEN R3a dated_securities, 2,67,667 -> 2,74,446 (6,779, +2.5%; z 1.025; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,63,217."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":26.65,"col":"G_CEN","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.104108,"prior":255.99,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":282.64,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- G_CEN: 3,32,476 -> 3,41,210 (8,734, +2.6%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 6,779 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a other_securities 1,017 (+10.5%); fincorp R3a tbills 880 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a recap_bonds 31 (+0.2%); fincorp R3a mf_lookthrough 27 (+10.5%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1006.27,"col":"G_CEN","component":"other_securities","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.104108,"prior":9665.72,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":10671.99,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- G_CEN R3a other_securities, 9,666 -> 10,683 (1,017, +10.5%; z 1.105; free low; no constraint binds on it). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 9,505."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":31.17,"col":"G_CEN","component":"recap_bonds","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":0.001549,"prior":20127.44,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:44ad8c3f4158","ref":"R3a","role":"anchored","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":20158.61,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- G_CEN: 3,32,476 -> 3,41,210 (8,734, +2.6%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 6,779 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a other_securities 1,017 (+10.5%); fincorp R3a tbills 880 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a recap_bonds 31 (+0.2%); fincorp R3a mf_lookthrough 27 (+10.5%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":871.38,"col":"G_CEN","component":"tbills","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.025068,"prior":34759.92,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":35631.29,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_BANK <- G_CEN: 3,32,476 -> 3,41,210 (8,734, +2.6%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 6,779 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a other_securities 1,017 (+10.5%); fincorp R3a tbills 880 (+2.5%); fincorp R3a recap_bonds 31 (+0.2%); fincorp R3a mf_lookthrough 27 (+10.5%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":["fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-1.54,"col":"G_STA","component":"mf_lookthrough","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.023118,"prior":66.49,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":64.96,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-808.46,"col":"G_STA","component":"sdl","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.00583,"prior":138666.63,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":137858.17,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3a.states_other_internal_debt","fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":849.3,"col":"G_STA","component":"state_loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.374331,"prior":2268.85,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":3118.15,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- G_STA R3a state_loans, 2,269 -> 3,118 (850, +37.4%; z 1.374; free low; binding: r3a.states_other_internal_debt (target 27,460, balanced 26,911, at its lower edge); r3b.states_nas_concept (target 4,94,609, balanced 4,99,555, at its upper edge)). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,377."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-1500.86,"col":"H_R1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.091883,"prior":16334.41,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":14833.55,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-2750.16,"col":"H_R2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.091157,"prior":30169.4,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":27419.24,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-4717.34,"col":"H_R3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.090513,"prior":52117.6,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":47400.25,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-8359.03,"col":"H_R4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.095098,"prior":87899.47,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":79540.45,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- H_R4 R5 loans, 87,899 -> 79,546 (-8,353, -9.5%; z 0.905; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. Bank loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled RTP return, less FISIM (AIDIS 2019 key, low); the cut is under 10%. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 79,121."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-8082.88,"col":"H_R5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.08442,"prior":95746.15,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":87663.27,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- H_R5 R5 loans, 95,746 -> 87,670 (-8,076, -8.4%; z 0.916; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. Bank loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled RTP return, less FISIM (AIDIS 2019 key, low); the cut is under 10%. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 87,187."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-1013.66,"col":"H_U1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.08839,"prior":11467.98,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":10454.32,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-2473.08,"col":"H_U2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.087017,"prior":28420.67,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":25947.59,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-5307.56,"col":"H_U3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.083068,"prior":63894.31,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":58586.75,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- H_U3 R5 loans, 63,894 -> 58,591 (-5,303, -8.3%; z 0.917; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. Bank loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled RTP return, less FISIM (AIDIS 2019 key, low); the cut is under 10%. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 58,088."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-9101.4,"col":"H_U4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.081455,"prior":111735.78,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":102634.38,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- H_U4 R5 loans, 1,11,736 -> 1,02,642 (-9,094, -8.1%; z 0.919; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. Bank loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled RTP return, less FISIM (AIDIS 2019 key, low); the cut is under 10%. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,01,892."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-14057.08,"col":"H_U5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.086221,"prior":163035.37,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":148978.29,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_BANK <- H_U5 R5 loans, 1,63,035 -> 1,48,989 (-14,046, -8.6%; z 0.914; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. Bank loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled RTP return, less FISIM (AIDIS 2019 key, low); the cut is under 10%. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,48,251."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":6.03,"col":"R_ROW","component":"di_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.156369,"prior":38.54,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:d9f49a1ce5c1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":44.57,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). Cell E_BANK <- R_ROW: 24,005 -> 27,761 (3,756, +15.6%; 4 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 oi_income 2,526 (+15.6%); rest_of_world R13 other_primary_income 1,224 (+15.6%); rest_of_world R13 di_income 6 (+15.6%). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":2524.42,"col":"R_ROW","component":"oi_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.156369,"prior":16143.97,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:cedf519d1ca4","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":18668.38,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). E_BANK <- R_ROW R13 oi_income, 16,144 -> 18,670 (2,526, +15.6%; z 1.156; free low; binding: row.r13_total (target 2,80,907, balanced 2,80,906, at its lower edge)). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 14,856. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":1222.94,"col":"R_ROW","component":"other_primary_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.156369,"prior":7820.84,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:ecbb815b3cf1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"balanced","v":9043.77,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). E_BANK <- R_ROW R13 other_primary_income, 7,821 -> 9,045 (1,224, +15.6%; z 1.156; free low; binding: row.r13_total (target 2,80,907, balanced 2,80,906, at its lower edge)). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 7,197. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":0.28,"col":"R_ROW","component":"pi_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.156369,"prior":1.81,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:d9f49a1ce5c1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_BANK","status":"estimated","v":2.09,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). Cell E_BANK <- R_ROW: 24,005 -> 27,761 (3,756, +15.6%; 4 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 oi_income 2,526 (+15.6%); rest_of_world R13 other_primary_income 1,224 (+15.6%); rest_of_world R13 di_income 6 (+15.6%). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":107.46,"col":"E_BANK","component":"borrowings","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.15914,"prior":675.23,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":782.69,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- E_BANK: 10,608 -> 12,294 (1,686, +15.9%; 3 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 deposits 1,536 (+15.9%); fincorp R4 borrowings 107 (+15.9%); fincorp R8 dividends 42 (+15.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one; E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1538.17,"col":"E_BANK","component":"deposits","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.15914,"prior":9665.56,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":11203.73,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_BANK R4 deposits, 9,666 -> 11,202 (1,536, +15.9%; z 1.159; free low; no constraint binds on it). Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one; E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 10,080."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":42.54,"col":"E_BANK","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.15914,"prior":267.33,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":309.88,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- E_BANK: 10,608 -> 12,294 (1,686, +15.9%; 3 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 deposits 1,536 (+15.9%); fincorp R4 borrowings 107 (+15.9%); fincorp R8 dividends 42 (+15.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one; E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":0.0,"col":"E_INSP","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0,"prior":952.83,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"estimated","v":952.83,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":22438.23,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"bonds","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.685185,"prior":32747.71,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":55185.94,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NBFC R4 bonds, 32,748 -> 55,180 (22,432, +68.5%; z 1.685; free low; no constraint binds on it). NBFC bonds pay about half the coupon in the prior (the NBFC expended scale 0.503: the RTP NBFC P&L leaves little for non-bank creditors; fincorp-4), so a rise toward the full coupon is toward the evidence. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 40,847."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1935.35,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.685185,"prior":2824.56,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":4759.91,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NBFC R8 dividends, 2,825 -> 4,759 (1,935, +68.5%; z 1.685; free low; no constraint binds on it). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. E_NBFC's onward distribution of the private NFC equity it holds (holding companies) is only the ratio-based prior (fincorp-2), so its dividends and MF-looked-through payments rising is toward the evidence; E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 3,523."},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":2398.75,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"premium","confidence":"low","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.03899,"prior":61522.84,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":63921.59,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- E_NFPR: 1,37,500 -> 1,52,810 (15,310, +11.1%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 7,028 (+17.0%); fincorp R8 distributed_income 3,912 (+17.0%); fincorp R17 premium 2,399 (+3.9%); fincorp R5 loans 1,058 (+17.0%); fincorp R8 dividends 913 (+17.0%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. Insurers' interest on private NFC bonds and loans is FSF ICPF holdings x the corporate coupon (unscaled; fincorp-30); the rise is within the coupon range."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1059.04,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.170036,"prior":6228.32,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":7287.35,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NFPR R5 loans, 6,228 -> 7,287 (1,058, +17.0%; z 1.170; free low; no constraint binds on it). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. Insurers' interest on private NFC bonds and loans is FSF ICPF holdings x the corporate coupon (unscaled; fincorp-30); the rise is within the coupon range. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 6,595."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":7031.87,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.170036,"prior":41355.29,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":48387.16,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NFPR R5 nongov_bonds, 41,355 -> 48,383 (7,028, +17.0%; z 1.170; free low; no constraint binds on it). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. Insurers' interest on private NFC bonds and loans is FSF ICPF holdings x the corporate coupon (unscaled; fincorp-30); the rise is within the coupon range. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 43,789."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":3913.97,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"distributed_income","confidence":"low","flags":["old_base_structure","depends_on_assumption"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.170036,"prior":23018.52,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:c1a4fab1d145","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":26932.49,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NFPR R8 distributed_income, 23,019 -> 26,930 (3,912, +17.0%; z 1.170; free low; no constraint binds on it). Private NFCs' old-base distributed income and dividends (D2-21, fincorp-27) are split over holders by FSF F51 book values (low). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. E_NFPR's prior deficit (-1,13,892) cuts what it pays in total. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 24,373."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":914.02,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.170036,"prior":5375.44,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":6289.46,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- E_NFPR R8 dividends, 5,375 -> 6,289 (913, +17.0%; z 1.170; free low; no constraint binds on it). Private NFCs' old-base distributed income and dividends (D2-21, fincorp-27) are split over holders by FSF F51 book values (low). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. E_NFPR's prior deficit (-1,13,892) cuts what it pays in total. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 5,692."},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.payer.e_nfpu.premium","fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":777.31,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"premium","confidence":"low","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.05,"prior":15546.17,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":16323.48,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained (bounded). Cell E_INSP <- E_NFPU: 51,324 -> 61,382 (10,058, +19.6%; 3 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 8,296 (+25.0%); fincorp R8 dividends 985 (+38.0%); fincorp R17 premium 777 (+5.0%). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. Insurers' interest on public NFC bonds is FSF ICPF holdings x the corporate coupon (fincorp-30); the Wave C band r5.insp_bonds.e_nfpu (target 33,185, balanced 41,481, at its upper edge) (fincorp-32) holds it within 25% of that stock x coupon, where the earlier run had +93.6% (an implied 15.7% yield). The rise inside the band is carried by E_NFPU's prior surplus."},{"binding":["fincorp:r5.insp_bonds.e_nfpu"],"bop_function":null,"change":8296.25,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.25,"prior":33185.0,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":41481.26,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained (bounded). E_INSP <- E_NFPU R5 nongov_bonds, 33,185 -> 41,481 (8,296, +25.0%; z 1.250; free low; binding: r5.insp_bonds.e_nfpu (target 33,185, balanced 41,481, at its upper edge)). E_INSP ran a -1,21,568 deficit because its SAM investment income (FSF stocks x rates) is 1,38,486 below the administrative sources behind its D44 payouts (IRDAI life and non-life investment income + EPF, EPS, exempted PF and NPS income: 7,80,914; fincorp-31), so raising its receipts moves toward that evidence. Insurers' interest on public NFC bonds is FSF ICPF holdings x the corporate coupon (fincorp-30); the Wave C band r5.insp_bonds.e_nfpu (target 33,185, balanced 41,481, at its upper edge) (fincorp-32) holds it within 25% of that stock x coupon, where the earlier run had +93.6% (an implied 15.7% yield). The rise inside the band is carried by E_NFPU's prior surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 46,453."},{"binding":["fincorp:r8.nfpu_nongov_holders"],"bop_function":null,"change":984.9,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.379857,"prior":2592.81,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":3577.71,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (bounded; fincorp-32). E_INSP <- E_NFPU R8 dividends, 2,593 -> 3,577 (985, +38.0%; z 1.380; free low; binding: r8.nfpu_nongov_holders (target 30,714, balanced 38,393, at its upper edge)). Public NFC dividends and MF-held bond interest to non-government holders are the R7-grossed issuer total (fincorp dividend_matrix) and FSF stock x coupon; the Wave C bands r8.nfpu_nongov_holders and r8.mf_bonds.e_nfpu hold their totals within 25% (the earlier run raised them 1.7-1.9 times). The rise inside the bands is E_NFPU's prior surplus (3,12,829), whose cause is the NAD question of government-33. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 3,629. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.insp_gos"],"bop_function":null,"change":85.3,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"private","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.001384,"prior":61626.98,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":61712.28,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.insp_gos","fincorp:f4a.public"],"bop_function":null,"change":-84.3,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"public","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.001495,"prior":56389.11,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":56304.81,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["government:gov.cofog.current_transfers"],"bop_function":null,"change":-65.49,"col":"G_CEN","component":"lic_pension_subsidy","confidence":"low","flags":["judgement_band"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.485223,"prior":134.96,"prior_status":"official","prov":"sam_government:1aaa7c94c2f1","ref":"R18","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":69.47,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- G_CEN: 2,82,997 -> 3,02,877 (19,880, +7.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 15,376 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a other_securities 2,443 (+28.1%); fincorp R3a public_account_funds 1,905 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a tbills 221 (+6.4%); government R18 lic_pension_subsidy -65 (-47.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":15323.61,"col":"G_CEN","component":"dated_securities","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.063621,"prior":240858.77,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":256182.38,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- G_CEN R3a dated_securities, 2,40,859 -> 2,56,235 (15,376, +6.4%; z 1.064; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,45,108."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":2433.73,"col":"G_CEN","component":"other_securities","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.279815,"prior":8697.65,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":11131.38,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- G_CEN R3a other_securities, 8,698 -> 11,140 (2,443, +28.1%; z 1.281; free low; no constraint binds on it). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 8,851."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":1898.56,"col":"G_CEN","component":"public_account_funds","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.063621,"prior":29841.81,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:a6436d808b15","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":31740.36,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- G_CEN: 2,82,997 -> 3,02,877 (19,880, +7.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 15,376 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a other_securities 2,443 (+28.1%); fincorp R3a public_account_funds 1,905 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a tbills 221 (+6.4%); government R18 lic_pension_subsidy -65 (-47.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":220.36,"col":"G_CEN","component":"tbills","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.063621,"prior":3463.64,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":3684.0,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_INSP <- G_CEN: 2,82,997 -> 3,02,877 (19,880, +7.0%; 5 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R3a dated_securities 15,376 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a other_securities 2,443 (+28.1%); fincorp R3a public_account_funds 1,905 (+6.4%); fincorp R3a tbills 221 (+6.4%); government R18 lic_pension_subsidy -65 (-47.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus."},{"binding":["fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":6187.34,"col":"G_STA","component":"sdl","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.03156,"prior":196050.38,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":202237.72,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_INSP <- G_STA R3a sdl, 1,96,050 -> 2,02,234 (6,183, +3.2%; z 1.032; free medium; binding: r3b.states_nas_concept (target 4,94,609, balanced 4,99,555, at its upper edge)). Government interest by holder is each payer line x HBS T107 holder shares (medium; 'other securities' use the dated-security shares, low); the payer totals are held (r3b.union_nas_concept 3%, r3b.states_nas_concept 1%, and since Wave C r3a.states_other_internal_debt 2%). Inside them balancing shifts interest toward the accounts in deficit: E_INSP (-1,21,568; fincorp-31: its SAM investment income is below the IRDAI, EPFO and NPS evidence) and E_BANK (-1,02,838; fincorp-2), away from E_NFPU and E_NBFC, whose priors are in surplus. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,12,591."},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-40.2,"col":"H_R1","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.016731,"prior":2402.77,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":2362.57,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":7.26,"col":"H_R1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.052634,"prior":137.93,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":145.18,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-62.4,"col":"H_R2","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.016534,"prior":3773.8,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":3711.4,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":13.62,"col":"H_R2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.053476,"prior":254.75,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":268.37,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-109.58,"col":"H_R3","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.01636,"prior":6697.8,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":6588.22,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":23.86,"col":"H_R3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.054222,"prior":440.07,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":463.93,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-176.72,"col":"H_R4","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.017602,"prior":10039.65,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":9862.93,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":36.3,"col":"H_R4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.048908,"prior":742.21,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":778.51,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-172.03,"col":"H_R5","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.014717,"prior":11689.12,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":11517.09,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":49.55,"col":"H_R5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.061285,"prior":808.47,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":858.01,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-36.51,"col":"H_U1","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.015787,"prior":2312.58,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":2276.07,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":5.49,"col":"H_U1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.056683,"prior":96.83,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":102.32,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-79.4,"col":"H_U2","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.015416,"prior":5150.21,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":5070.81,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":13.98,"col":"H_U2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.058275,"prior":239.98,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":253.96,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-151.84,"col":"H_U3","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.014353,"prior":10578.92,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":10427.08,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":33.91,"col":"H_U3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.062852,"prior":539.51,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":573.42,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-247.23,"col":"H_U4","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.01392,"prior":17760.75,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":17513.52,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":61.06,"col":"H_U4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.064722,"prior":943.48,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":1004.54,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r17.premiums"],"bop_function":null,"change":-377.25,"col":"H_U5","component":"premium","confidence":"medium","flags":["depends_on_assumption"],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.015202,"prior":24815.86,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:e804e530cf07","ref":"R17","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":24438.61,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":81.49,"col":"H_U5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.059197,"prior":1376.65,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_INSP","status":"balanced","v":1458.14,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-304.03,"col":"E_BANK","component":"bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.089307,"prior":3404.36,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":3100.33,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_NBFC <- E_BANK: 1,04,945 -> 95,570 (-9,374, -8.9%; 4 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 deposits -5,927 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 borrowings -3,143 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 bonds -304 (-8.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-3142.27,"col":"E_BANK","component":"borrowings","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.089307,"prior":35185.09,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":32042.82,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_NBFC <- E_BANK: 1,04,945 -> 95,570 (-9,374, -8.9%; 4 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 deposits -5,927 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 borrowings -3,143 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 bonds -304 (-8.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-5925.83,"col":"E_BANK","component":"deposits","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.089307,"prior":66353.59,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:2affd44f4de7","ref":"R4","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":60427.76,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- E_BANK R4 deposits, 66,354 -> 60,427 (-5,927, -8.9%; z 0.911; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 56,547."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-0.46,"col":"E_BANK","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.312159,"prior":1.47,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"estimated","v":1.01,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_NBFC <- E_BANK: 1,04,945 -> 95,570 (-9,374, -8.9%; 4 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R4 deposits -5,927 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 borrowings -3,143 (-8.9%); fincorp R4 bonds -304 (-8.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Interbank and bank-NBFC interest is FSF stocks x the scaled RTP rates. E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. Balancing moves interest from the surplus account to the deficit one."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-25.37,"col":"E_INSP","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.406593,"prior":62.4,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":37.03,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":0.0,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":0.0,"prior":184.97,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"estimated","v":184.97,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-12226.13,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"loans","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.087174,"prior":140249.35,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":128023.22,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- E_NFPR R5 loans, 1,40,249 -> 1,28,024 (-12,226, -8.7%; z 0.913; free medium; no constraint binds on it). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. NBFC interest from private NFCs (FSF stock x scaled rate, medium) falls as E_NBFC sheds its surplus and E_NFPR (-1,13,892) its deficit. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,21,350."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-3.9,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.087174,"prior":44.72,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":40.82,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_NBFC <- E_NFPR: 2,46,296 -> 2,01,664 (-44,632, -18.1%; 4 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R8 distributed_income -26,268 (-30.6%); fincorp R5 loans -12,226 (-8.7%); fincorp R8 dividends -6,134 (-30.6%); fincorp R5 nongov_bonds -4 (-8.7%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: Private NFCs' old-base distributed income and dividends (D2-21, fincorp-27) are split over holders by FSF F51 book values (low). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. E_NFPR's prior deficit (-1,13,892) cuts what it pays in total."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-26269.36,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"distributed_income","confidence":"low","flags":["old_base_structure","depends_on_assumption"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.305693,"prior":85933.83,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:c1a4fab1d145","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":59664.47,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- E_NFPR R8 distributed_income, 85,934 -> 59,666 (-26,268, -30.6%; z 0.694; free low; no constraint binds on it). Private NFCs' old-base distributed income and dividends (D2-21, fincorp-27) are split over holders by FSF F51 book values (low). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. E_NFPR's prior deficit (-1,13,892) cuts what it pays in total. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 74,354."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-6134.6,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.305693,"prior":20067.86,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":13933.26,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- E_NFPR R8 dividends, 20,068 -> 13,934 (-6,134, -30.6%; z 0.694; free low; no constraint binds on it). Private NFCs' old-base distributed income and dividends (D2-21, fincorp-27) are split over holders by FSF F51 book values (low). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. E_NFPR's prior deficit (-1,13,892) cuts what it pays in total. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 17,364."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":34297.44,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"loans","confidence":"medium","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.452083,"prior":75865.38,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":110162.82,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). E_NBFC <- E_NFPU R5 loans, 75,865 -> 1,10,163 (34,297, +45.2%; z 1.452; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37). GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 86,782. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":742.7,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"nongov_bonds","confidence":"medium","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":0.452083,"prior":1642.84,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":2385.54,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). E_NBFC <- E_NFPU R5 nongov_bonds, 1,643 -> 2,386 (743, +45.2%; z 1.452; free medium; no constraint binds on it). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37). GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,879. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["fincorp:r8.nfpu_nongov_holders"],"bop_function":null,"change":-188.09,"col":"E_NFPU","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":["unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.181184,"prior":1038.11,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":850.02,"verdict":"unexplained","why":"Unexplained (fincorp-37, Checkpoint B). Cell E_NBFC <- E_NFPU: 78,546 -> 1,13,398 (34,852, +44.4%; 3 entries). Largest moves: fincorp R5 loans 34,297 (+45.2%); fincorp R5 nongov_bonds 743 (+45.2%); fincorp R8 dividends -188 (-18.1%). Public NFCs' interest to banks and NBFCs is FSF stock x the scaled RTP return (medium), less FISIM; the balanced level implies a rate well above the RTP return on advances. E_NFPU's prior keeps 3,12,829 over NAS 2026 St 1.9 public NFC saving (closure institution_gaps). Its cause is not a documented source disagreement: the old-base NAS 2024 St 2.1A shows departmental enterprises passing 95.6% of their primary income on as D6 + D7 (1,48,177 in 2022-23), a flow the new-base SAM does not write (government-33, a NAD question for Checkpoint B). After the Wave C constraints held the published outlets (R9d at the AFS total, R18 at IGAS-2, T4a within 25% of the old-base share, R7x lines and payer shares, insurers' and MF bond interest near FSF stock x coupon, non-government dividends near the R7-grossed issuer total), what is left of the surplus lands on E_NFPU's remaining weak-keyed flows (fincorp-32, -37)."},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.fins_gos"],"bop_function":null,"change":-13577.11,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"private","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.052112,"prior":260539.46,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":246962.35,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- F_GOSC F4a private, 2,60,539 -> 2,46,960 (-13,580, -5.2%; z 0.948; free medium; binding: f4a.fins_gos (target 9,68,693, balanced 9,68,692, at its lower edge)). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. f4a.fins_gos holds banks + NBFCs + RBI GOS at SUT industry 55; balancing moved GOS from NBFCs to banks, toward the RTP P&L evidence (banks' operating profit), which fincorp-2 shows the NAS 8.12 split understates for banks. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,26,457."},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.fins_gos","fincorp:f4a.public"],"bop_function":null,"change":-8400.3,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"public","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.054837,"prior":153187.44,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:93d0bcbf8e39","ref":"F4a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":144787.14,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_NBFC <- F_GOSC F4a public, 1,53,187 -> 1,44,785 (-8,402, -5.5%; z 0.945; free medium; binding: f4a.fins_gos (target 9,68,693, balanced 9,68,692, at its lower edge); f4a.public (target 4,34,233, balanced 4,34,234, at its upper edge)). E_BANK ran a -1,02,838 deficit and E_NBFC a 2,32,893 surplus in the prior (fincorp-2): FISIM leaves banks' SNA property income negative, while the F4a GOS split (NAS 8.12 S125-S127 GVA, including MFs, auxiliaries and captive institutions) gives NBFCs more GOS than the RTP-scaled interest matrix can carry. f4a.fins_gos holds banks + NBFCs + RBI GOS at SUT industry 55; balancing moved GOS from NBFCs to banks, toward the RTP P&L evidence (banks' operating profit), which fincorp-2 shows the NAS 8.12 split understates for banks. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,33,148."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-616.27,"col":"G_CEN","component":"dated_securities","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.066477,"prior":9270.45,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":8654.18,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-80.53,"col":"G_CEN","component":"other_securities","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.240549,"prior":334.77,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":254.24,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-308.14,"col":"G_CEN","component":"tbills","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.066477,"prior":4635.26,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":4327.12,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-812.58,"col":"G_STA","component":"sdl","confidence":"medium","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.094616,"prior":8588.17,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":7775.59,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3a.states_other_internal_debt","fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-1375.46,"col":"G_STA","component":"state_loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.054678,"prior":25155.51,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":23780.05,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-692.22,"col":"H_R1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.37536,"prior":1844.16,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":1151.93,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_R1 R5 loans, 1,844 -> 1,152 (-692, -37.5%; z 0.625; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 1,405. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-1276.82,"col":"H_R2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.37486,"prior":3406.13,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":2129.31,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_R2 R5 loans, 3,406 -> 2,129 (-1,277, -37.5%; z 0.625; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,600. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-2203.1,"col":"H_R3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.374418,"prior":5884.08,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":3680.98,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_R3 R5 loans, 5,884 -> 3,681 (-2,203, -37.4%; z 0.626; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 4,494. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-3746.96,"col":"H_R4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.377571,"prior":9923.86,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":6176.9,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_R4 R5 loans, 9,924 -> 6,177 (-3,747, -37.8%; z 0.622; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 7,554. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-4002.05,"col":"H_R5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.370226,"prior":10809.76,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":6807.7,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_R5 R5 loans, 10,810 -> 6,808 (-4,002, -37.0%; z 0.630; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 8,324. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-482.88,"col":"H_U1","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.372957,"prior":1294.74,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":811.85,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-1193.68,"col":"H_U2","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.372013,"prior":3208.7,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":2015.02,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_U2 R5 loans, 3,209 -> 2,015 (-1,194, -37.2%; z 0.628; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,459. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-2663.98,"col":"H_U3","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.369296,"prior":7213.68,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":4549.69,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_U3 R5 loans, 7,214 -> 4,550 (-2,664, -36.9%; z 0.631; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 5,546. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-4644.67,"col":"H_U4","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.368187,"prior":12614.99,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":7970.32,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_U4 R5 loans, 12,615 -> 7,970 (-4,645, -36.8%; z 0.632; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 9,728. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-6837.45,"col":"H_U5","component":"loans","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.371465,"prior":18406.72,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:7e7130491097","ref":"R5","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":11569.27,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained. E_NBFC <- H_U5 R5 loans, 18,407 -> 11,569 (-6,837, -37.1%; z 0.629; free low; no constraint binds on it). Households fell short of NAS 2026 St 1.9 household saving by Z = -3,84,547 in the prior (closure hh_saving; K4 held by cf.k4.hh_saving). Their net property income is several lakh crore below the old-base NAS 2024 St 5.0 ratio of net D4 to primary income (fincorp-19), so the household receipts of property income rise toward that structure and their interest payments fall. NBFC loans to households are FSF stock x the scaled NBFC rate (AIDIS 2019 key, low); E_NBFC's prior surplus (2,32,893, fincorp-2) pushes the same way, so these fall much more than bank loans; no source supports a 37% lower NBFC household interest. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 14,154. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-785.26,"col":"R_ROW","component":"di_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.204602,"prior":3838.0,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:d9f49a1ce5c1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":3052.74,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). E_NBFC <- R_ROW R13 di_income, 3,838 -> 3,053 (-785, -20.5%; z 0.795; free low; binding: row.r13_total (target 2,80,907, balanced 2,80,906, at its lower edge)). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level. GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 2,987. The prior account gaps (BALANCING.md 'Pre-balancing imbalances'; closure institution_gaps): G_STA 4,50,426, households Z -3,84,547, E_NFPU 3,12,829, G_CEN -2,98,948, E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_INSP -1,21,568, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_RBI 25,646."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-1.49,"col":"R_ROW","component":"oi_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.204602,"prior":7.3,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:cedf519d1ca4","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":5.81,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). Cell E_NBFC <- R_ROW: 5,970 -> 4,749 (-1,221, -20.5%; 4 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 di_income -785 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 other_primary_income -398 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 pi_income -37 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 oi_income -1 (-20.5%). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-397.98,"col":"R_ROW","component":"other_primary_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.204602,"prior":1945.14,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:ecbb815b3cf1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":1547.16,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). Cell E_NBFC <- R_ROW: 5,970 -> 4,749 (-1,221, -20.5%; 4 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 di_income -785 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 other_primary_income -398 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 pi_income -37 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 oi_income -1 (-20.5%). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-36.82,"col":"R_ROW","component":"pi_income","confidence":"low","flags":["level_unexplained"],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.204602,"prior":179.94,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:d9f49a1ce5c1","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_NBFC","status":"balanced","v":143.13,"verdict":"level unexplained","why":"Explained in direction; level unexplained (rest_of_world-27). Cell E_NBFC <- R_ROW: 5,970 -> 4,749 (-1,221, -20.5%; 4 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 di_income -785 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 other_primary_income -398 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 pi_income -37 (-20.5%); rest_of_world R13 oi_income -1 (-20.5%). The BoP totals hold (row.r13_total within +-1 of NAS 6.1 / BoP); only the domestic payer or recipient split moves, and that split is a low-confidence FSF-stock or pro-rata key (rest_of_world-4, -6, -10, -12). Entries of one weight in an account move by one factor, the signature of the account's prior gap: E_NBFC 2,32,893, E_BANK -1,02,838, E_NFPR -1,13,892, E_RBI 25,646. No RoW source contradicts the move or supports its level."},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-71.07,"col":"E_BANK","component":"msf","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.020822,"prior":3413.37,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:eb0cad7d503e","ref":"R4","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":3342.3,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-30.92,"col":"E_BANK","component":"rbi_loans","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.020822,"prior":1484.91,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:eb0cad7d503e","ref":"R4","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":1454.0,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-2.7,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"rbi_loans","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.01508,"prior":178.94,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:eb0cad7d503e","ref":"R4","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":176.24,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-30.46,"col":"E_NBFC","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.621857,"prior":48.99,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":18.53,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-163.71,"col":"E_NFPR","component":"dividends","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.737453,"prior":221.99,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:19c2349607ce","ref":"R8","role":"free","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":58.28,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:f4a.fins_gos","fincorp:f4a.public"],"bop_function":null,"change":-3.71,"col":"F_GOSC","component":"public","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.01,"prior":370.62,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:d15263e949c7","ref":"F4a","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":366.91,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-1695.02,"col":"G_CEN","component":"dated_securities","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.019306,"prior":87799.2,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:1e86aa1ea7f3","ref":"R3a","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":86104.18,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":[],"bop_function":null,"change":-7.61,"col":"G_CEN","component":"wma","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.019306,"prior":394.38,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:1e86aa1ea7f3","ref":"R3a","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":386.76,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-47.91,"col":"G_STA","component":"sdl","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.02,"prior":2395.6,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_fincorp:1e86aa1ea7f3","ref":"R3a","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":2347.69,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["fincorp:r3a.states_other_internal_debt","fincorp:r3b.states_nas_concept"],"bop_function":null,"change":-23.04,"col":"G_STA","component":"wma_od","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"estimated","pct_change":-0.642533,"prior":35.86,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_fincorp:10110fd1063b","ref":"R3a","role":"free","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":12.82,"verdict":null,"why":null},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-1960.34,"col":"R_ROW","component":"reserve_asset_income","confidence":null,"flags":[],"label":"derived","pct_change":-0.018597,"prior":105413.5,"prior_status":"derived","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:0468ddf37b2a","ref":"R13","role":"anchored","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":103453.16,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. Cell E_RBI <- R_ROW: 1,31,059 -> 1,11,166 (-19,893, -15.2%; 2 entries). Largest moves: rest_of_world R13 reserve_income_unexplained -17,933 (-69.9%); rest_of_world R13 reserve_asset_income -1,961 (-1.9%). The largest mover is explained under its entry: By design (D2-7, rest_of_world-25): this entry is BoP 1.B.2.4 reserve income less the RBI Annual Report's figure, and fincorp builds E_RBI's saving on the AR basis. The Wave C band k2a.rbi_ar_basis (target 94,159, balanced 96,659, at its upper edge) (fincorp-34 (a)) holds E_RBI's saving near the NAS-derived figure, so balancing removed most of the unexplained income from E_RBI and re-split the fixed R13 total over the other recipients; about 6,929 of it is the Union's IMF income (rest_of_world-26)."},{"binding":["rest_of_world:row.r13_total"],"bop_function":null,"change":-17931.99,"col":"R_ROW","component":"reserve_income_unexplained","confidence":"low","flags":[],"label":"balancing_set","pct_change":-0.699226,"prior":25645.5,"prior_status":"estimated","prov":"sam_rest_of_world:4027933c8729","ref":"R13","role":"free","row":"E_RBI","status":"balanced","v":7713.51,"verdict":"explained","why":"Explained. E_RBI <- R_ROW R13 reserve_income_unexplained, 25,646 -> 7,713 (-17,933, -69.9%; z 0.301; free low; binding: row.r13_total (target 2,80,907, balanced 2,80,906, at its lower edge)). By design (D2-7, rest_of_world-25): this entry is BoP 1.B.2.4 reserve income less the RBI Annual Report's figure, and fincorp builds E_RBI's saving on the AR basis. The Wave C band k2a.rbi_ar_basis (target 94,159, balanced 96,659, at its upper edge) (fincorp-34 (a)) holds E_RBI's saving near the NAS-derived figure, so balancing removed most of the unexplained income from E_RBI and re-split the fixed R13 total over the other recipients; about 6,929 of it is the Union's IMF income (rest_of_world-26). GRAS (no weights, no constraints) gives 23,477."}],"node":"FC"}